I believe this is the same problem:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-January/msg00174.html

but in different libraries.  I'm guessing that the "apt-get update" has 
gone slightly wrong, so it may be an issue  for the SL guys to look at.

Chris

Ioannis Vranos wrote:

> Yes, SELinux is enabled. I am sending a small screenshot attached.
>
> Any reasons why one should not use SELinux?
>
>
>
> Chris Dennis wrote:
>
>> You don't happen to have SELinux installed do you?  I believe this is a
>> symptom of SELinux forgetting the correct permissions for a file,
>> although I don't use it myself so I can't be sure.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>