Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | N.N. |
Date: | Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:22:20 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yes Yi, I am interested.
I tried it some years ago for compiling it to windows.
But there was alway one time you got blocked.
I have to give it up, and worked with the cygwin port.
At that time I even was unable to remove the compiler warnings to make
the source warning-free.
I never tried it for Linux, but if some people are interested ?
Alain.
On 12/16/11, Yi Ding <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I've tried that in the past, haven't gotten super far because of the
> different dependencies.
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Yi Ding <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Has anyone tried to package gcc 4.6 for scientific linux? Would this
>>> be a difficult task? Is this something people are interested in?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yi
>>
>> You could try rebuilding the SRPM from fedora 16 and see how far you get.
>
--
Complex numbers: They are all fun and games until someone loses an i.
|
|
|