SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
N.N.
Date:
Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:22:20 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Yes Yi, I am interested.
I tried it some years ago for compiling it to windows.
But there was alway one time you got blocked.
I have to give it up, and worked with the cygwin port.
At that time I even was unable to remove the  compiler warnings to make
the source warning-free.
I never tried it for Linux, but if some people are interested ?

Alain.

On 12/16/11, Yi Ding <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I've tried that in the past, haven't gotten super far because of the
> different dependencies.
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Yi Ding <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Has anyone tried to package gcc 4.6 for scientific linux?  Would this
>>> be a difficult task?  Is this something people are interested in?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yi
>>
>> You could try rebuilding the SRPM from fedora 16 and see how far you get.
>


-- 
Complex numbers: They are all fun and games until someone loses an i.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2