SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Any 7 rumors?
From:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:17:41 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
On 04/08/2014 10:17 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>     Is SL not PCI compliant because it is not a commercial
>     effort?  I thought SL got all the patches the RHEL
>     got?  Please elucidate.
>
> There is no PCI requirement(s) to use commercial OS. Please read the
> requirements instead of FUD!

Hi Eero,

    Do you have a link to that particular requirement?

Many thanks,
-T

ATOM RSS1 RSS2