SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:47:20 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
My first thoughts on the matter are to blame myself today.

Its been one of those days for the last two with me and the security 
tree.....

My hope is that you cached your repodata when I was cleaning up a 
previous errata deployment error.

Can I have you try 'yum clean all' and see if the problem simply goes away?

Pat

On 12/09/2011 09:22 AM, David Mabry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We currently have a cluster setup and configured using the cluster suite
> provided by SL 6.1.  During a recent yum update attempt it appears that
> there may be a dependency issue between a couple of the packages
> involved when using clustering.  Please see the following output from
> yum:
>
> ...
> -->  Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: resource-agents conflicts with rgmanager
>   You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
>   You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
>
> I believe the issue is in the package resource-agents.  Both packages
> are installed from the sl repo as shown from the yum list output below:
>
> resource-agents.x86_64                  3.0.12-22.el6               @sl
>
> resource-agents.x86_64                  3.9.2-7.el6
> sl-security<---update
> rgmanager.x86_64                        3.0.12-11.el6
> @sl
>
> Any help will be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> David Mabry
> Senior Systems Engineer, RHCE
> Education Networks of America
> 615-312-6100
> 888-612-2880


-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer

ATOM RSS1 RSS2