I've sent a message to Dag Wieers asking if he can add nut into his repo's.
Hopefully he does (maybe if he sees enough demand for it from people
requesting it he will), but if he doesn't then yeah, recompile from sources.

It's just much easier and less time consuming rolling out RPM's on multiple
machines than recompiling from source on multiple machines.

Michael.

> Stick with NUT, it is very good, and if you have it set up already 
> the config stuff is done.
> 
> Get the source from :
>          http://us1.networkupstools.org/
> to get the most recent version, and recompile.
> 
> -Andy
> 
> At 04:57 AM 3/31/2005, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
> >Up to now we've used the Network UPS Tools (NUT) to monitor the UPS on our 
> >server. This doesn't seem to be included in RHEL (and so SL), and google 
> >won't suggest an alternative!
> >
> >Presumably something is included to handle a UPS, so what are people using 
> >here? I suppose I could always rebuild the FC3 nut package if necessary.
> >
> >Jeremy
> >
> >--
> >Jeremy Sanders <[log in to unmask]>   http://www-xray.ast.cam.ac.uk/~jss/
> >X-Ray Group, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, UK.
> >Public Key Server PGP Key ID: E1AAE053
> >
> 
> ******************************************************************************
> Andrew R. Cook                                            Phone (631)
>  344-4782 Brookhaven National Laboratory                             
>  FAX (631) 344-5815 Chemistry Department, Bldg 555a, Rm 292          
>                 [log in to unmask] Upton, NY 11973-5000             
> http://www.chemistry.bnl.gov/~acook/cook.html
------- End of Original Message -------