LISTSERV - SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

	LISTSERV Archives
	SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Home
	SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS August 2011

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Staying with SL6.0 without updating to SL6.1
From:	Andreas Petzold <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Andreas Petzold <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:37:35 +0200
Content-Type:	multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:	Text/Plain (598 bytes) , smime.p7s (4 kB)

	Hi,

On Friday, August 12, 2011 10:54:06 carlopmart wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
>   Due to a certain bugs and problems with cluster stack on SL6.1
> (corosync, cman, kernel, etc) release (all problems are reported to
> upstream), I need to maintain two hosts at SL6.0 version.
> 
>   Is it possible to do this applying all security errata only for this
> version?

SL doesn't force you to upgrade to the new ".X" releases and unless you 
changed the standard yum repos this will not happen automatically. To be sure 
that certain packages are not upgraded, simply exlude them in the yum config.

	Cheers,

		Andreas

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV