SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SL: not a good choice as a workstation
From:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:03:56 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
On 11/07/2014 02:49 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> On 11/07/2014 03:45 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>> I can't help
>> but notice that Cent OS 7 is keeping up-to-date now
>> with Firefox, but SL 7 is not
>
> What version differences are you seeing?  The latest SL7 firefox is
> firefox-31.2.0-3.el7_0 published as security errata on Nov 3.
>
> Pat
>

It was 24 something.  The "yum update" did not update
it.

Seems to me I was looking at it on Nov 4, but I could
be misremembering it.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2