On 16/07/13 19:07, Yasha Karant wrote:
> We need to support a variety of applications on our 3D scientific
> visualisation client workstations, running SL6x x86-64 using the
> proprietary Nvidia 3D Xwindows drivers (and Nvidia CUDA5 along with
> OpenCL).
>
> When I installed rpmfusion for vlc production current (2.0.6) for IA-32
> on my laptop, there were no issues.  When I attempt to install the same
> thing here, I find:
>
> Test Transaction Errors:   file /usr/lib64/libBasicUsageEnvironment.so.0
> from install of live555-0-0.37.2012.04.27.el6.x86_64 conflicts with file
> from package live-2012.02.04-1.el6.x86_64
>    file /usr/lib64/libUsageEnvironment.so.0 from install of
> live555-0-0.37.2012.04.27.el6.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> live-2012.02.04-1.el6.x86_64
>    file /usr/lib64/libgroupsock.so.0 from install of
> live555-0-0.37.2012.04.27.el6.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> live-2012.02.04-1.el6.x86_64
>    file /usr/lib64/libliveMedia.so.0 from install of
> live555-0-0.37.2012.04.27.el6.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> live-2012.02.04-1.el6.x86_64
>
> end messages from Add/Remove Software GUI.
>
> I have found:
>
> http://www.live555.com/liveMedia/

'live' comes from the ATrpms repo for el6, and rpmfusion/ATrpms are 
known to conflict.  What happens if you try to yum remove it?  Why do 
you have it installed?

http://dl.atrpms.net/el6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/live-2012.02.04-1.el6.x86_64.rpm

John


>
> but nothing for live-2012 (nor my guess of live2012) that seems relevant
> to this issue.
>
> I am not asking for specifics on debugging -- however, I do not
> recognize either live555 nor live-2012 except from the above search
> yields -- indicating that live555 provides a "set of C++ libraries for
> multimedia streaming, using open standard protocols (RTP/RTCP, RTSP,
> SIP)" -- that makes sense for an application such as vlc.  Does anyone
> know anything about these "packages"?  Will one suffice for the other
> and thus a manual install with a force nodeps override will in fact work?
>
> Technical question:  for a .so file or an executable, ldd will inform as
> to the required dependencies.  What is the functional equivalent for a
> rpm file to ldd, preferably an equivalent that will list both the
> dependencies in terms of actual files (e.g., foobar.so.3.7.19-mnj) and
> (hopefully) the RPMs from a particular repository (e.g., SL, rpmfusion,
> etc., depending upon the distribution that supplied the RPM) that supply
> such files?
>
> Otherwise, I am back to the issue of finding the "non-free" and other
> CODECs needed for vlc current production release built from source (not
> SRPM, but source).
>
> Any information would be appreciated.
>
> Yasha Karant
>