SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephen John Smoogen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephen John Smoogen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:15:01 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
On 3/22/07, Michael Mansour <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > I hear RH is going to open source this.
> > > Does the SL team plan to build this as
> > > well?  Just curious.
> >
> > I guess we will research this.  If someone else rebuilds it we can
> > always add it to contrib.
> >
> > Keep us updated if you hear more about this.
>
> The biggest reason why this surprised me (and I will only believe it when I
> see it), was when I took the RH401 Satellite course, I was not even allowed to
> have an eval certificate to have a temp Satellite install of it. It was only
> available in the classroom to quickly go through and then have the exam the
> last day.
>

Ok as far as I know there has been no official declaration that they
are open-sourcing the RHN server. There have been a couple of articles
about them having to do so at some point.. but that is speculation of
the authors not an announcement.

The biggest reason that people were speculating about this was that
RHN had an 'open' satellite beta for 5.0 and that they were using yum
versus up2date. That and a wild speculation gets more page hits and
blog posts than getting definitive answers.


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2