SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Adrian Sevcenco <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Adrian Sevcenco <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:27:59 +0300
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1125 bytes) , smime.p7s (3177 bytes)
Troy Dawson wrote:
> Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Sorry to be offtopic but given that there is already talk on the next 
>> version of RHEL 
>> http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/07/29/whats-next-in-red-hat-enterprise-linux-part-1/ 
>>
>> i am wondering the idea of common repositories is still in place...
>> Thanks for any feedback,
>> Best regards,
>> Adrian
>>
> 
> Although there is talk of the next RHEL, it's not going to be until late 
> next year.  So there is still a long way away.
> The answer is that there is talk of working more with CentOS on the next 
> release.  We currently haven't hammered out many details, so there isn't 
> really too much to say.
> One thing I do want to point out, because the rumor keeps comming up.  
> There will be a Scientific Linux 6.  We will keep our identity.  We will 
> not completely merge with CentOS.
> 
> Troy
Hi Troy, thanks for the answer and for all the good work :)
Of course that a complete merger cannot be done as the user base and 
user goals are different... i asked this question now because i am 
thinking that the work to be done for this is just huge :)
Thanks,
Best regards,
Adrian


ATOM RSS1 RSS2