SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:22:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
On 04/27/2011 06:19 PM, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
> I've just run into an issue with 6.0 and I'm not sure how bugs are
> handled here.  Should they just be submitted upstream to RH?
>
> Specifically, ifup isn't behaving as expected bringing up an aliases.
>
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-lo:0
> DEVICE=lo:0
> IPADDR=10.0.0.1
> NETMASK=255.255.255.255
> NAME=lo:0
>
> Running ifup lo:0 does not add the alias to lo as expected.  However, if
> "ifup lo" is ran, it will add both the lo config and any aliases it
> finds.  This config will result in the expected behavior after a
> reboot or a "service network restart".
>
> 5.x hosts (and earlier, at least in CentOS) behave as expected allowing
> the operator to add/remove aliases using ifup/ifdown.
>

Hello,
Sending an email here with a bug is appropriate.

If this is a bug, I am quite sure it's The Upstream Vendors (TUV) bug.

But I'm not sure it's a bug, it might be one of their new "features".

There was *alot* of networking changes with RHEL6.  I still haven't 
worked out which of my issues are bugs, and which are features (intended 
to work that way).  But I had to change how I did things for SL6.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2