Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:22:32 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 04/27/2011 06:19 PM, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
> I've just run into an issue with 6.0 and I'm not sure how bugs are
> handled here. Should they just be submitted upstream to RH?
>
> Specifically, ifup isn't behaving as expected bringing up an aliases.
>
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-lo:0
> DEVICE=lo:0
> IPADDR=10.0.0.1
> NETMASK=255.255.255.255
> NAME=lo:0
>
> Running ifup lo:0 does not add the alias to lo as expected. However, if
> "ifup lo" is ran, it will add both the lo config and any aliases it
> finds. This config will result in the expected behavior after a
> reboot or a "service network restart".
>
> 5.x hosts (and earlier, at least in CentOS) behave as expected allowing
> the operator to add/remove aliases using ifup/ifdown.
>
Hello,
Sending an email here with a bug is appropriate.
If this is a bug, I am quite sure it's The Upstream Vendors (TUV) bug.
But I'm not sure it's a bug, it might be one of their new "features".
There was *alot* of networking changes with RHEL6. I still haven't
worked out which of my issues are bugs, and which are features (intended
to work that way). But I had to change how I did things for SL6.
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|