SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:13:17 +0530
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
hello to all,

i am a newbie to Scientific Linux. for my project work i need to have
RHEL. so i searched Google for Open alternatives and found 2 of my
choice:  CentOS and Scientific Linux. i liked Scientific Linux, may be
because of my childhood love of Nuclear Physics and Astronomy :-)

i have used Fedora, the base of RHEL, Scientific Linux and CentOS.
Fedora is the one of the most buggy *NIX distro i have ever seen. i
just want to know whether Scientific Linux is stable and reliable
enough to work with. i will use Scientific Linux primarily for
developing astronomical image processing software and also for
watching Bruce Lee's movies ;-)


NOTE: please do not take my email is as offense, to be true to you
people, Fedora just sucks :-(


-- 
http://arnuld.blogspot.com/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2