SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ian Murray <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ian Murray <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:42:06 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)


> to myself in private. Do *not* send it to this mailing list unless your
> message is specifically about Scientific Linux. Please do not start a


Firstly, I don't really like being told where I can and can't post. If the discussion is off-topic, then so is the topic IMHO.

Anyway, I don't really see the point of the blog post. All three 'clones' are what they are so there will be delay. It's the nature of the beast.

I am not a member of the scientific community, so I am free to choose the distribution that suits based on its merits. I do not use a clone as a bastion host for security reasons. Otherwise I choose SL based on my perception of the robustness distribution's support infrastructure. So far, I have been very impressed even if they are not "first out the door".

My 2p.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2