SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SL7x and the 'epel' repo
From:
Steve Gaarder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steve Gaarder <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:45:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines) 
In that case, I'm thinking that it could be useful to maintain an EPEL 
mirror that does not get updated between TUV's release and the SL release. 
I could do that for my own use or it could be a community effort. 
Thoughts?

Steve Gaarder
System Administrator, Dept of Mathematics
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
[log in to unmask]

On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Akemi Yagi wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Steve Gaarder <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
>> Thinking about this some more, I assume that EPEL is actually built against
>> the latest from TUV, so 7.1 in this case.  Correct?
>
> Yes, that is correct. There is a similar discussion thread on the
> CentOS mailing list:
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2015-March/150945.html
>
> Akemi
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2