Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:34:44 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Have not used Linux with these drives, but I do have a few Windows systems (laptops) with them. Essentially, the SSD side is an enlarged cache and does not appear as a separate device to the OS - which makes them transparent.
Basically, the idea is to enlarge the cache on the media side of the drive's interface to improve performance. The effect is supposed to allow a lower RPM speed drive to perform at a level comparable to a higher RPM drive. Haven't done side by side comparison, but I think the actual performance boost is smaller than advertised from my experience.
--- A
--- Original Message ---
From: "Yasha Karant" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: January 27, 2015 11:22 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Hybrid disk drives
There are hybrid disk drives that have a "small" SSD flash memory along
with the regular spinning media, typically to serve as a cache for lower
latency. Does anyone have long term experience with these units? Most
flash memory is not designed for the long term repeated read/write/erase
cycles of a primary disk drive -- how are these holding up? Is the
flash configuration totally transparent to the Linux file systems and
formatting operations?
Yasha Karant
|
|
|