SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brett Viren <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brett Viren <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Mar 2011 16:47:38 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (670 bytes) , application/pgp-signature (201 bytes)
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]> writes:

> It has been the tradition of Scientific Linux to never mess with the
> kernel.  It's not a matter of not knowing how to recompile the kernel,
> it's a matter of support.  We don't have the resources to support a
> second kernel.

With the recent change in Red Hat's business tactics, messing with the
kernel apparently just got more difficult:

http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Controversy-surrounds-Red-Hat-s-obfuscated-source-code-release-1200554.html

Or, maybe, now we should just consider Red Hat's kernels to come
"pre-messed".


-Brett.

PS: my guess is that RH will not continue with this silly behavior.
They should really know better.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2